You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: agree and disagree ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
65. agree and disagree ...
i'm in full agreement with the idea that a long-term view is necessary ... and i strongly agree with your point that, whether one likes Howard Dean or not, it is more wise to invest in "the movement" than in celebrity ... if Dean is to be today's figurehead of the movement, no problem ... but the vision, as you pointed out must be a long-term vision not overly dependent on any specific person ...

so to that extent, i agree with your post ...

HOWEVER, i'm not necessarily in full agreement with your implied theme that change must occur from within the Party ... here's how i see it ... the Party is an established structure with access to power ... if we are able to gain a voice within the structure, that's probably the fastest way to "get a seat at the table" ... but if those currently holding power within the Party refuse to share power and if we are unable to gain a voice, alternatives are viable and well worth considering ... i have no disagreement with those who say third parties will not be winning elections (nationally) anytime soon ... i agree with that ... but "winning" is not the end goal of fledgling third parties ... the goal is to be given a greater voice ...

if a substantial exodus, say 25%, of Democrats left the Party and went to a third Party, i.e. they remained politically active and didn't just "drop out", the Democratic Party that was able to get them to vote ABB the last time would be forced to negotiate modifications to its platform to attract the "outsiders" ...

so, while I agree that working inside the Party is a better "first step", i don't see it as the only viable step ... i cannot imagine selling my soul to a Party that goes along with an illegal invasion, allows the super wealthy to own our government, and infringes on a woman's right to choose ... if I don't see "sharing of power" occurring under the big tent and the Party promotes a platform and candidates that are not at least reasonably inclusive of my values, I think it would be best to do all I could to force them to compromise ... and I think, in some circumstances, that the force i could bring to bear might be greater by leaving the Party ...

it's not a decision I'll make lightly ... but it is very definitely a possibility ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC