You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: The problem is that it's always Catholics that are the subject for [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. The problem is that it's always Catholics that are the subject for

satirical art (and this applies to other than just visual arts) while Jews and Muslims are off-limits. I have no problem with a sculpture suggesting that some bishops are not as virtuous as they should be. That's a perfectly valid point. But where are the sculptures of evil rabbis? I can easily Google up several cases of rabbis convicted of multiple cases of sexual abuse of children, complete with cover-ups by their Jewish communities. I'd imagine I could find cases involving Muslims as well. I know for sure about the rabbis because people have claimed in these forums that rabbis are never pedophiles so I checked it out. Despite being married, rabbis and Protestant clergy are pedophiles in percentages such as are found among the celibate Catholic clergy. A certain percentage of men are pedophiles, no matter what their career choice is. But we have heard much about Catholic priests and not a word about the rabbis (many of them Orthodox rabbis) or Protestant clergy.

The sculpture is a fine caricature of an unpleasant-looking man dressed as a bishop and there's nothing new about that. Nor is there anything new about using sexual imagery for shock effect in art. Look at the art of the Renaissance in Italy and you can see unpleasant-looking clergy and explicit sexual imagery. Artists very definitely criticized evil men in the clergy then. This, however, was when everyone was Catholic if they were Christian, so artistic statements against evil clergymen were about condemning evil people, not about condemning the entire Catholic hierarchy nor condemning the Catholic faith nor condemning/ denying God.

Today, some people confuse a relatively small number of evil men in the clergy with the whole of Catholicism. Some even confuse evil with God or at least with the church that exists to serve God (however imperfectly it may do so.) It is not because of God or because of religion that evil exists. It is because human beings have a capacity for evil. And that capacity for evil means that there are evil Protestants, evil Jews, evil Muslims, evil Buddhists, evil agnostics, evil atheists, etc., as well as evil Catholics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC