You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: Well, your figure is a little off, but you've got the right idea! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Well, your figure is a little off, but you've got the right idea!
... a hunter-gatherer adult only does what can be described as live-maintaining 'work' about 8-10 hours per week? That's some progress!

I think it was more in the neighborhood of 4-6 hours per day, on average. In any case, you're correct in noting the lack of "progress" that we've made on this issue.

And while these hunter-gatherers may not have had easy lives -- disease and injury were not treatable by means of modern medicine -- the lives they had were in many ways RICHER than ours. They gained immense pleasure from the deep interaction they had with each other. They were never concerned about "things" the way we are. They were generally HAPPIER than we are -- actually much more so.

At the heart of this is actually classic Marxism, although I wouldn't hasten to connect it as such. What Marx really proposed was not that the workers should get "their piece of the pie" as much as that they should equally share in the gains of productivity. In doing so, they could work 4 hours per day instead of 8 -- thus giving them more time to spend with their families, enriching themselves in the arts, communining with nature, and so on. In short, they could spend more time building a much richer society.

The only reason that class warfare came into this at all was that since the time that men began to live in towns and cities, there developed divisions in wealth and class. And it had always been the interest of those at the top to ensure that all the benefits of technology, productivity, etc. flowed to THEM rather than being used to enrich SOCIETY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC