|
Is exactly what needs to be said. To answer more specifically would be wrong. Kerry acknowledges complexities in international relations. Dean makes it overly simple, then lets his aides explain what he "really" meant.
And as we know that Dean is famous for making straight-shooting comments one day, then qualifying them the next - let's take a look at his elaboration:
KUCINICH: Would you fund keep the troops in Iraq?
DEAN: Yes.
KUCINICH: You would?
DEAN: If the president was willing to pay for it.
KUCINICH: I would say bring our troops home, Governor.
DEAN: You can't do that. And I'll tell you why.
KUCINICH: We have to bring our troops home. They're targets right now.
DEAN: Can I tell why I disagree?
KUCINICH: Yes, finish.
DEAN: First of all, let me tell you what I agree with you about. And in all due respect to John and Joe and Wes and John Edwards and Dick Gephardt, maybe you thought the war was a good idea and maybe you thought it wasn't a bad idea. It wasn't a good idea. The problem is that we empowered the president to run roughshod over us in the last election because nobody stood up to him on the October vote. If you all had voted no, we could have gone out and made our case to the American people. But instead you didn't vote no.
KUCINICH: You said no, and that's not true. I led the effort. Do you want to correct that statement?
DEAN: No, no, I didn't mention you. I didn't mention you.
Now if I can explain what my position on Iraq is, it's this. Now that we're there...
WOODRUFF: Could you make it brief so we could let...
DEAN: I'll try to make it as brief as I can.
Now that we're there, we can't pull out responsibly. Because if we do, there are more al Qaeda, I believe, in Iraq today than there were before the president went in. If they establish a foothold in Iraq, or if a fundamentalist Shiite regime comes in, allied with Iran, that is a real security danger to the United States, when one did not exist before when Saddam Hussein was running the place.
---
I happen to agree with that, but I wouldn't without the elaboration. Why - because his "yes" is very different from a Republican "yes." You may try to pretend there is no difference, but not everything can be expressed in short, guttural breaths.
|