You
clearly imply that you believe Clark to be lying about the current topic:
I'm not sure which is the lie, the first statement or now this new one. since
the post you were responding to was relaying two incidents that he/she believed to have been clark lies, both past tense:
Just like when he told the world he was a Democrat on September 2, 2003. That was a lie. Or when he told the world he was running for president on the Democrat ticket, yet he had registered w/the FEC and filled in his affliation UNK. That was a lie too.Because your response wasnt consistent with the message of the original post, it appears pretty obvious that you were responding to the subject title of the post, which was
"Lies are lies" You even propose a
conspiracy theory to fit your hypothesis:
So now he's finally realized that this is going to be a liability with many aware but non-fundamentalist Christians and Muslims who are determined to wage a spiritual battle against the fundmantalists because of certain prophecies.
It was definitely a faux-pas to seem as if he were announcing a special arrival. 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(764 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
