You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: just an interjection [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. just an interjection
Canadian politics is not about the US. Not everything in the world is about the US.

The party structure in Canada is not like the US -- there are five parties with significant representation in the House of Commons right now, just for starters.

You are taking one news report and exploiting one little bit of information about Canada to draw conclusions that you apply in the US. It simply doesn't work.

One news report does not a Canadian winter make. The perennial Tory-Alliance party is a fun diversion on our political scene, but it is of very little consequence; it is a death dance, on both sides. What weakened both parties involved was not the splitting of "their" vote, it was simply their very own irrelevance to a large majority of Canadians. They are not going to unite and waltz on to victory by virtue of their unity.

I find it curious and pretty annoying that just about every time some news of Canadian politics is reported at DU, it virtually immediately gets turned into an attempt to grind some axe about US politics.

The thing is that there might actually be some interesting lessons to be learned by USAmericans from observing and learning about Canadian politics, and comparing and contrasting with US politics.

But that's not what this is. This is just exploitation of a pretty meaningless "foreign" factoid to score points in some debate that the factoid has virtually nothing to do with. Really, no one appreciates having their own experience drafted into the service of someone else's arguments that they might not even agree with, and essentially misconstrued and misrepresented for that purpose. Me, I'd rather just be ignored by the south of the border throngs than used in that way.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC