You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: Well, first off, our human intelligence wasn't atrophied at all [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
104. Well, first off, our human intelligence wasn't atrophied at all
As time goes on, we find out more and more that there were warnings being shouted out by the intelligence community months before 911, but Bushco chose not to hear. He received a briefing on the matter during the first days of August, but chose to vacation.

Recruiting folks from the Middle East is no big deal, they have probably been on the payroll for years. Hell, Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA for years, and you know what they say about working for the Agency, once CIA always CIA. Hell, apparently even the CIA is the one that seriously helped stir up fundementalism in the Mid East by introducing Wahhabism to the mujahadeen in Afghanistan.

And there are quite frankly too many loose ends around 911 that make the official story to implausible to stand in the bright light of day. How did not one, not two, but three steel structures defy the laws of physics and fall virtually straight down into their own footprint? How come a pro golfer whose plane goes off course is surrounded within minutes by Northcom fighter jets, but planes known to carry hijackers are allowed forty-five minutes to circle out over Ohio, then come in and strike the WTC and the Pentagon, and no jets show up until too late? It is a standing order to have fighter jets ready to go on a seconds notice, yet they couldn't catch up to these jets? Please, somebody countermanded the standing order, and who has the power to do that? And now they try to tell us that it was fire that collapsed the WTC towers. Fire that could have only reached a maximum of 900 degrees was supposed to weaken structural steel to the point of collapse? Please, structural steel has to have a minimum of 1200 degrees to weaken just a little.

There are too many questions, too many loose ends, too many odd things going on that day in order for it all to just be coincedence, or a bunch of fanatics that rammed into the towers. The official story is full of more holes that Swiss cheese, and sad to say, we'll probably never know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC