You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Insecurity...is it the cognative mother of social motivation and [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Insecurity...is it the cognative mother of social motivation and
actualization, and politics?

It is a part of the human condition, and we need to understand it.

When presented with something that you and I percieves as risky we try to bring that thing "under control" constrain it, or somehow reduce insecurity about it by providing a sense of management of the risk.

Everyone including the left has this aspect to their personality. Conservative personalities really do seem not only to be very sensitive to very different anxieties, but they also seem to rely on very different solutions for managing insecurity.

On a qualitative level we are different mostly in what we view as creating insecurity and the way we view the management techniques impact on insecurity.

The left sees pollution and global warming as a threat, we seek government and international protection from the polluting ways of industries, communities, and individuals.

The current flock of republicans fear people who don't believe as they do, look like them, people who think in complex and abstract rather than simple terms like them, or respect the same authorities as them. They construct things like the Patriot Act to manage their insecurity. They fear weakness and insist on global hegemony in military and economic domains as the means to be secure.

We fear the invocation of a police state, the loss of civil rights, we fear the Patriot Act, we want to manage that risk by having 16 provisions of the Act struck. We fear the role of empire and the inevitable conflicts maintaining hegemony must bring. They fear bad outcomes and use them to justify the bad means which we fear. They fear paying taxes for public institutions thus reducing their profits, we fear their profits stripping support from institutions we see as necessary.

What sort of difference does understanding politics as the management of insecurity mean to progressives?

We do not need to be _strong on the military_,we do not to be bullyingly tough on the world. What we need to do is to understand and apply solutions that reduce insecurity. As much as we reduce insecurity we gain support for the methods we propose for managing it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC