You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: You're right. This is the same law the court rejected from Nebraska [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. You're right. This is the same law the court rejected from Nebraska
because it failed to address exceptions. This law says NO EXCEPTIONS. The supernaturalists who wrote it claim they're counting on one Justice to change his or her vote, which would make all the difference. But I think the RNC will be satisfied even if the courts reject it, because the base will have a nice piece of bloody red meat to gnaw on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC