You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #65: The problem is broken down to this: there is a percentage of cases [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. The problem is broken down to this: there is a percentage of cases
in which D&X is medically necessary to save a patient's life. Even the law acknowledges this by allowing the exclusion for just such cases. Call all other instances those in which D&X is elective, if you'd like. Do you believe the Congress of the US is medically competent to delineate the elective from the necessary? Neither do I, but that is precisely what the Congress is pretending to be able to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC