Reply #88: LOL [View All]

SO your argument is that "It's not one vote, it's two" Do you really think that two votes is all the context there is?

And if "your fight" is tax cuts, why are you so interested in IWR? You're starting to sound too emotional to be rational. You're arguing that Kerry is wrong on IWR because he was wrong on tax cuts. And you're using both of those arguments to dishonestly claim that Kerry's motto is "Kerry is less horrible than Bush*"

Are you still claiming that Dean was inconsistent based on the two quotes that started this whole thing?

I am saying that there are all sorts of inconsistencies in the things Dean has said and done. And it's inconsitent of YOU to demand the context when it comes to Dean, but ignore the context (and two votes is NOT all of the context) when it comes to others.

And Iwon't deny being inconsistent in NOT helping you refute claims about Kerry.

Why do you refuse to consider the context? Don't you want to consider all the facts, or is that someone else's job?

Just tell me if you are still claiming that Dean was inconsistent with his stance on Iraq in February.

Consistency isn't something that happens in one given moment, such as "in February". Consistency is something that is demonstrated over long periods of time. During this campaign, Dean has made inconsistent statements, and I see no reason why we should limit this to February.