You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Let's look at some facts. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Let's look at some facts.
Either 37 or 38 states have DOMA (Defense of Marriage Acts)that allow them not to recognize a gay marriage if another state enacts it. Clinton signed a federal DOMA that give states that authority. In all polls the general public overwhelmingly is against gay marriage being legal. If Gay marriage becomes an issue in 04, there will be a percentage of voters for whom this will be the issue that tips the balance, one way or another. Since way more people are against it than for it, it will tip more to vote Rep than to vote Dem. Remember that elections are decided by the swing votes in the center. Translation: The issue is a big time loser for us.

Will it be an issue? Look at this link: http://www.msnbc.com/news/984936.asp

If the Massachusetts Supreme Court requires legal gay marriage, those gay activists for whom this is THE only issue are expected to file suit in the U.S. Supreme Court. The DOMAs are almost certainly unconstitutional under the "full faith and credit" clause of the constitution. Even a conservative court will almost certainly feel bound by that clause and declare the DOMAs dead. If that happens, the states will feel like they are having gay marriage rammed down their throats against their will.

The Federal Marriage Amendment will then have enough pressure to pass and go to the states. Does anybody here really think that a Rep congressperson or senator will vote against it? What about a Dem C or S in a DOMA state? Hey, they want to get reelected too. It will pass and go to the states. Since 37 or 38 states already have DOMAs, then that is the magic number needed for ratification. Those states have already recently expressed their will on the issue.

Now before anybody flames me as being a freeper, my analysis is not an indication of my personal desires. I have a step-son who is gay and is a loved memeber of our family. I view myself as like a weather forecaster who is looking at a major hurricane that is coming to shore. Wishing it would go away won't make it go away. This storm is going to break during an election year, and I can't see any good for us in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC