Reply #7: Many parallels b/t Hitler/Poland in 1939 and Bush/Iraq in 2003 [View All]

<<<Bush and Hitler used the same Big Lie to create fear in their countries and justify a "pre-emptive" war against foreign terrorists... and the buring of the Reichstag in 1933 has some very errie parallels to 9/11...seriously, just go to google and search>>>


Prescott Bush (President's Grandfather) financed Hitler into power from 1922 onwards and had his assets confiscated by the US Government in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. That was Prescott Bush's contribution to 54 million deaths. (There is a history of Facism that runs in the Bush family, but G.H. Bush only talked about a "New World Order" - but the neocons and Bush the son are actually engaging in the same madness that Hitler and Nazis tried -military domination.)

There are similarities between Hitler invading Poland and George W. Bush invading Iraq:

1. Each happened simply because just one warmonger politician decided to invade.

2. Both events had the Bushes behind it (Hitler had Prescott Bush from 1922).

3. Hitler told the Germans that the Poles were going to build a large army and ivnade Germany. Bush told the Americans that Saddam was going to threaten us and our allies with all his new WMD...(nevermind that was a transparent pack of lies - as Ritter has stated since 02')

4. Both Hitler and Bush chose the "defense" of their nation to justify their invasion - both as "pre-emptive" wars.

5. Both Bush and Hitler own(ed) the world's biggest military machines. (Hitler needed some gold for his conquest, which he plundered from Poland and other countries, and Bush needed to control the oil and re-convert Iraq's oil exports back to the dollar standard. In both cases the military was used to acheive economic goals - in the name of nationalism and "defense" of course)

6. Both Hilter and Bush seized power by usurping the electoral process. (Bush brothers destroyed 250,000 Democratic votes in 4 electoral frauds in Florida, declared "W" the winner by 537 votes. Hitler seized power from the German political process under the emergency acts of 1933)

7. Hitler and Bush both gave fradulent reasons to invade. (Saddam Hussein has never been in partnership with bin Laden, no involvement w/ 9/11, nor has he rebuilt his WMD program). But the Bushes and bin Ladens have been business partners for 24 years. The bin Ladens were the first investors in GW Bush's first company, Arbusto in 1978 and are still joint owners of The Carlyle Group, a multi billion dollar weapons company which the Bushes built up with corrupt government contacts. BTW, the Poles were not going to invade Germany either...

8. Freedom in Germany and the USA had been denied before the attack (This time it's Bush's cynically named USA Patriot Act which nullifies the Bill of Rights of 1791. Both Hitler and Bush did/can imprison people without trial or judicial process.)

9. Both Hitler and the Bushes convinced the people that "God was on their side." (Gott und mit - "God is with us" and Bush's crusade against evil, pandering to do "God's will")

10. The populations of both Germany and the USA were indoctrinated by govenment propaganda. If you disagreed with Hitler or Bush you were branded an unpatriotic person, or perhaps even a traiter. Scott Ritter was called an "enemy of the state" by the US when he spoke in Finland(?) (Karl Rove/Neocons with 24/7 "news" has duped Americans into believing they are "under terror threat" and war is "inevitable")

11. Hitler and Bush both kept their populations subdued with fear. (Fear often prevents people from thinking critically, and therefore easily manipulated. In October 02' Bush, Cheney and Rice all said a "mushroom" cloud be in our future if we don't invade Iraq-NOW!)

12. Both wars could have been prevented simply by arresting the President of the invading country and prosecuting him for election fraud and war crimes.

Sadly, there are plenty of parallels b/t 1939 and 2003...


(edited from the below website)

http://www.grenadier2.dreamwater.com/wwwboard/2431.html