This is exactly what I am saying. Dean is saying he wants to revoke all of the tax cuts and says that they were ineffective because local and state taxes were raised to compensate.
What does he think that revoking the tax cut will do to stop the newer taxes? It will do nothing and the working American taxpayer with kids will end up paying the original taxes, the new higher state and local taxes and will have nothing to show for it.
Surely that is not the entirety of Dean's plan for this. I have not studied Dean as much as I should have, but I find it hard to believe that he would not at least address the end result of his proposed plan of action.
Can any Dean supporters fill me in on what I am missing?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(116 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
