You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #102: That's only partially true
[View All]
Eloriel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 102. That's only partially true |
|
While the Supreme Court of VT did force the issue, there was still the option of changing Vermont's Constitution. He did NOT go with that option, choosing to do what was right instead of what was politically expedient. Further, he signed the bill when he was at only 35% in the polls with an election just months away. He went on to campaign hard on exactly why what he did was the right thing to do. And he won the next election.
Here's a tip for you: The WHOLE Story is much more informative -- and intellectually honest -- than half the story.
Eloriel
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread