Reply #70: This is not new, this [View All]

has already been going on. Unless I am missing something, everyone agreed that these terrorist groups meant harm to us, but everyone, current administration included, say the evidence was not strong enough, or direct enough to cause action. I see nothing with a massive impact in here. This is just smudge with no direct evidence of something to act upon.

The 9-11 findings have only said to me, that the Bush administration had the most conclusive evidence to go from. It even had the hind site of the past Clinton Administration, and his fathers administration and present intelligence to look to for information. Yet still failed to prevent 9-11 attacks, and has failed to get bin ladin.

Even if their is a grain of truth to this, just because someone is
told of problems, or the possibility of problems, or they spoke closely to or advised...does not create clear actionable intelligence. Is this not what the Republican part says now?

I trusted the Clinton administration to have handled it the way they thought was appropriate with what evidence they had. I can surely say he never bank rupted our country and made us so hated in the international world like this one has.

Remember, the huge debt and the countries demanding payment upon those debts when Clinton came to the WH., it was scarey.
We thanked George Senior for those.