You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: One Does Not Need To BE A Fraud To SPOT A Fraud. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. One Does Not Need To BE A Fraud To SPOT A Fraud.
Your analogy and comparison is illogical and fails to make sense. How does James Randi's previous career as an illusionist make him any less believable as one who exposes fraud and lies? That's just a silly thing to say.

The quacks rely on desparate and fearful people to practice their craft of lies and deception. They are the ones most likely to believe the "here's-the-cure-that-the-FDA-doesn't-want-you-to-know-about" hype and tinfoil hat crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC