You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Why not use Hurricane Control Weapons for GOOD? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
FULL_METAL_HAT Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Why not use Hurricane Control Weapons for GOOD?
Well... that's just the thing, if you have a covert weapon that could be used for good, if you made it public, it wouldn't be a covert weapon anymore...

here's some surprisingly interesting reading if you are interested:

From http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ohKPaZeCp-4J:www.bariumblues.com/storm_fury.htm+scientific+american+hurricane+control&hl=en

It seems that we had a deliberate effort to stifle successful efforts to make hurricanes less damaging at the very time that the national weather bureau and other weather-related government agencies were being privatized. The National Weather Service, like the Federal Reserve Bank, the Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation is a privately owned and controlled organization. Each operating in their respective fields in totally unregulated and largely unsupervised environments, with the public thinking that each is part of the government."

We are not only seeing the deliberate decision to let disaster happen when it could be prevented -- we are seeing something much worse -- the deliberate use of this technology developed by minds that sought to help mankind being used as a means of destroying our homes and killing our people for the sake of "disaster-industry " profit and "national-emergency" power.


and this one

From: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:PojbVIapAEQJ:members.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/clandestine2.htm+%22Clandestine+Weather+Modification%22&hl=en

What we have been calling clandestine weather modification of course is known by another name by those who are employing this technology, that name is "geoengineering."

The following article from a Stanford Journal answers all of my questions about why and how such a vast undertaking would be undertaken at all and why it must be done in secrecy.


And here's the google Web Results (about 174) for "Clandestine Weather Modification":
http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Clandestine+Weather+Modification%22

and the Google Groups has about 1990 posts on CWM:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Clandestine+Weather+Modification%22&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wg http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Clandestine+Weather+Modification%22&num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&scoring=d">Sorted by Date
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC