You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Upon reviewing your previous posts DenverDem, it's obvious [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
FULL_METAL_HAT Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Upon reviewing your previous posts DenverDem, it's obvious
you have no love of *.

Please allow me to draw some plausible connections between CWM and "Busholini":

  • Control over weather to create intensify/direct hurricanes would be a great way to pour billions of dollars (from public FEMA funds!) into Floridian pockets, and if you attached that to "Dear Leader" Jeb Bush, and by extension, the Republicans, you could have a strong influence over voters who might think "gee, Jeb and Republicans shore helped us out after a horrible fluke of damaging storms"

  • Assuming a simpler control over rain, you could use that as a weapon against voters by making it really rainy on election day... Like it was in ohio on Nov 2

  • If your control efforts were really really effective, you might consider using it for almost anything where it'd be handy, like during the reunion of the opposition party, raining on their parade, or even their library opening... The image left in people's minds might just be a sad, soggy lot of losers. At least a bright sunny day would be something to be avoided...

It's true CWM is waaaaay outside the voter fraud issue, but considering the you're advocating efforts be put into the investigation of an entire election being stolen from nearly 300 million people (in what is regarded as the most democratic democracies in the whole world!), wouldn't it seem to be at least reasonable that if they had this ANTI-VOTER-WEAPON, that they'd use it?

And for my money, knowing what they _could_ be using, helps figure out what they _would_ actually use...

I think this kind of research at least opens people's eyes to how BIG these folks could think...

Oh yeah, you specifially say "It's just another attempt to smear any discussion of fraud as tin hatism" ... "then it _is_ the unintended effect", where have you see this smearing specifically? I know the Cybernet threads got super crazy with disruptors, but could this CWM _really_ cause anyone to stop looking into election fraud??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC