You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: I disagree with half of what you said, but agreed with the other half [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I disagree with half of what you said, but agreed with the other half
Forcing animals to do dumb things is dumb. It was a matter of time, even for the experts. And circuses are vile. Control over animals doesn't prove humankind is better. Only more cruel.

However, zoos are not a bad thing. Animals get free room and board, healthcare, ability to run around and be themselves although penned within a comparatively confined space to keep them from getting hurt by forces which lie outside their confines. There's even a shelter to go hide in if they're tired of being watched. Good heavens, zoo critters get more respect, food, and shelter than many HUMANS do. In that respect, zoos are pathetic because humankind won't even take care of humankind! :Grr: :mad: :puke: You call that abuse?! And how is it enslavement, the confined animals are not being asked to build the Pyramids much less do anything else. Just live.

And with deer and other animals roaming the country freely to hurt people ort get ran over on the freeway... You bet your sweet bippy zoos are better.

But I DO AGREE, large preserves are ideal. But look at corporate america, they've got the power and they only care about their bottom line. Everything else can rot. They don't care if their actions cause the Earth to exploder unless they don't get a big enough profit out of it. I wish they'd rot instead. Corporate america is the true evil here.

As for PETA, as long as they think out their argument beforehand and not resorting to goofy antics in order to make a point. Tying chicken production farms to Nazi death camps was utterly silly, if not vulgar. It tried to inspire anger, but it did - only the anger was against PETA, tarnishing their credibility. PETA needs to not to the vulgar song and dance. Just a video showing how animals are kept and slaughtered and the gross conditions within would turn many peoples' heads for THE RIGHT REASONS. Doing a song and dance about how animals have feelings can help if properly done. But tying in a chicken factory as Auschwitz? Good lord, they nearly lost me as a fan of theirs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC