You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: I have a little quibble with your statement of "don't be in movies if [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. I have a little quibble with your statement of "don't be in movies if
you don't like having yr picture taken." There's a big difference between having your picture taken and having your privacy completely invaded. I have a brother who is an actor. Acting is what he was born to do and he would be wasting his talents if he were in a different profession. But I've been with him when people come and make inappropriate comments to him in front of my little nephew. I've read some of the creepy fan mail he's received. He's pretty good-natured about it but he's also not super A-list so he knows it could be much worse, and probably is for someone like Scarlett.

But anyway, why should someone be subjected to constant public scrutiny every minute of every day of their lives just because they're in movies? Why should they be hounded by paparazzi while taking their kids to school? Why should they have to make sure their hair and clothes and makeup are perfect when they take their trash out, just in case someone is hiding behind the bushes? Of course there are the media whores who'll do anything for attention, but why does being an actor automatically mean you have no right to even an ounce of privacy? I'm sorry, I just don't agree with that.

Yes, your probably right that Scarlett would've been better off driving to the police station. But perhaps, just perhaps, she was freaked out and not thinking straight. Not to mention she's, what, 19 years old? I think "no pity here" is pretty harsh unless you've never made any judgment errors in your life, especially when you were that age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC