You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #46: "The Descent of Woman" Elizabeth Morgan (or get that monkey off my back) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. "The Descent of Woman" Elizabeth Morgan (or get that monkey off my back)
Edited on Tue Aug-12-03 06:49 PM by Wonder

I believe that is who wrote it. Basically it is Darwins theory of evolution but instead of it being from the persepctive of the male anatomy, Morgan follows the anatomical evolution from the perspective of the female ape's anatomy... Prior to the shift in the pelvis, male apes could penetrate female apes, at there discretion, at random and would penetrate her vagina which was exposed, from behind.

Morgan has one chapter dedicated to that point in time when the alignment of the spine changed when the apes moved from walking on all fours to standing erect and becoming bipedal. She argues that at one point this caused great confusion within the male ape. The shift in the female pelvic placement.

Before it shifted he could penetrate at random and from behind because the sway of the ape spine in essence exposed the female genitals from behind. Once it shifted, penetration from behind became more difficult, because the shift of the pelvis also shifted the female genitals to the front. In doing so this shift in anatomy also gave the female neanderthal more say in the matter. Morgan suggests that at this interval in female anatomic evolution, once the pelvis shifted, was when the struggle between the male and the female really began.

According to Morgan there was a transitional period wherein the male apes would try to penetrate as they had always from behind (and without consent in essence), but since the pelvis had shifted; female apes were finding it easy to just shake the monkey off her back.

Overtime a struggle ensued wherein the male ape had to struggle with the female ape in an effort to turn her around. In having to penetrate from the front of the women, that meant he actually had to deal with her as well, penetration for him no longer just based on his random choice. The rest is history.

Morgan's theories of course were all backed up from both an archeological and antropological perspective. I found her book interesting, the chapter I described most fascinating and thought provoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC