You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: I'm an ecologist, and I disagree with your friend's assessment.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm an ecologist, and I disagree with your friend's assessment....
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 06:01 PM by mike_c
Most urban and semi-urban environments are severely degraded by LOTS of factors. On the one hand, domestic cats are invasive species, but that's largely a management issue that argues for habitat management solutions (if people paid more attention to the reproductive habits of their pets, or discharged their responsibilities as pet owners better, the feral pet population would be much smaller and have less impact on native prey populations). Not all their prey are native species, however. Many, like european starlings, are just as invasive as the cats that prey on them.

I rescue feral cats. I feed them, turn them in for spaying or neutering when I can, then release them. Many are not truly feral at all, i.e. unsocialized with humans-- most are abandoned pets (there's that irresponsible habitat management issue again!) and in many cases they become attached to their caregivers and can often be brought back into human habitation where they can be better managed. We're doing this with a young female stray kitty at my partner's workplace right now (she's already spayed, marked, and released, but now she's becoming somewhat social and attached-- and since she's well fed, she hunts less).

Further, natural predator/prey relationships have been disrupted FAR more by human activities unrelated to pets than by all the pet cats (and strays) in the world. In many cases, cats simply replace other predators who have been extirpated. They're not direct ecological replacements because they often have different population dynamics, different foraging strategies, etc from natural predator populations but there's nothing intrinsically wrong with that, as long as ecosystems can adapt to them. Most of the concern seems to be about song birds, but if I recall correctly cats are rarely a severe threat to songbird populations except in settings where songbirds are generally doing relatively well, and where the real threats have more to do with things like habitat loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC