Reply #13: Re: Writing Lehane and Fabiani [View All]

I think that's an excellent idea for a variety of reasons. Here are some:

1. Clark's campaign managers need to understand that grassroots input is vital to a successful campaign. By engaging them directly, that may encourage them to better understand that reality. (If they don't, screw 'em.)

2. Many of the ideas generated by grassroots supporters can help the candidate. Certainly Howard Dean's campaign works that way and has had tremendous benefits from grassroots ideas. For example, the Texas television ads were originally suggested by a campaign supporter via the Internet.

3. Such communication will hold Lehane and Fabiani accountable. If they screw up, unfairly attack other Democrats, botch media handling, or otherwise fail in one or more ways, Democrats will put them on notice that they're being watched and measured. That should help them avoid such screw ups in the first place.

4. By hearing from Democratic voters, both of Clark's campaign managers will get additional input so that they won't be as out-of-touch, hopefully. It's very easy to get bad information from other consultants, advisors, and pols, so a more direct line of information from voters is important.