an unaware Dean and aren't trying to stick a knife into Clark, please explain why David Brooks would write these two articles:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/18/opinion/18BROO.html, in which he says Clark and his supporters are "too mealy mouthed" to take a stand on the future of Iraq, and
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/13/opinion/13BROO.html?ex=1066622400&en=b7b0d5ed2a15179f&ei=5070 , in which he says "If you were to pick a presidential candidate on the basis of social standing — and really, darling, who doesn't — you'd have to pick Howard Brush Dean III over George Walker Bush......that culture, which George Bush and Howard Dean were born into, did have a formula for producing leaders."
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore