You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Ya can't do much epidemiology looking at only raw totals and refusing ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ya can't do much epidemiology looking at only raw totals and refusing ...
to compute any ratios. And, of course, I naturally suspect that the next time I ever dare to quote raw totals, you'll be happily sneering that I should have used percentages instead.

In any case, it is not at all clear how to reliably compare mortality for which a industrial cause seems immediately obvious to mortality for which an industrial cause is statistically inferred.

For the diffuse morbidity and mortality, which is estimated only by crude epidemiology, it is clear that poorly designed studies will underestimate effects, by mixing groups that should have remained separate. But there is another problem: in many cases, morbidity mechanisms cannot determined precisely enough to allocate a casuality to a cause; and in fact in many cases, a multiplicity of insults may all have contributed to the final outcome. Crudely speaking, the problem of allocating a cancer (to an immune problem or to radiation damage or to chemical exposure or etc) may impossible because the different steps in a multistep process may have distinct causes.

Nor is it clear to me exactly what events to count, even in the concrete case: people die by electrocution, regardless of the type of generator; people die traffic accidents going to or from the power plant, regardless of type; in the coal, hydro, and nuclear plants, people fall off ladders.

Meanwhile, electrocity is obviously providing some benefits that may improve health and prolong life, such as improved hygiene conditions.

So my reaction to your anecdotes about coal-mining accidents is not that there's no real issue but rather that the debate will be a sticky wicket the resolution of which would not only require hard tedious work --- and but would also likely be entirely irrelevant politically.


BTW, the Texas Tech system was (last I looked) separate from University of Texas system ( http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/ed.toc.htm ). People sometimes like their real home institution to get credit for their presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC