You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Exactly. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly.
Also, I would maintain that an efficient storage battery and an electric motor/generator with regenerative braking would be more efficient if you really want to displace the pollution to a central power plant.

Now, if the grid were to be run by wind, hydro, tidal, and solar inputs, none of which work particularly well with a moving vehicle :) you could make a good case for a storage car. But even so, compressed air is not a great medium for the reasons I cited above (radiative loss of thermal energy in the compressed state.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC