You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: The cost of LN2 "fuel" and energy converson [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Bdog Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. The cost of LN2 "fuel" and energy converson
Liquid Nitrogen Manufacture

The cost of the LN2 "fuel" is expected to be reasonable. The primary expense for producing LN2 is the energy cost for compression of air.9 Cryogenic separation of nitrogen from other condensables in air typically requires only a very small fraction of the total energy,10 so the ideal work to manufacture LN2 from air is very nearly that for using nitrogen as a feedstock. This work is exactly the reversible work obtainable from an ideal cryo-engine, 769 kJ/kg. The actual work required in a modern LN2 plant is 2.0-2.5 times the minimum, or 1540-1920 kJ/kg.11 Assuming an industrial electric rate for interruptible power of 5¢/kW-h, the energy cost would amount to 2.6¢/kg-LN2, in accord with delivery prices of LN2 in large quantities. Marketing the other commercially important components of air will help offset the LN2 production costs. Since the equipment needed for air liquefaction can be powered solely by electricity, it is conceivable to decentralize the "fuel" manufacturing process and to place small scale production facilities at the LN2 dispensing sites. A cost-benefit analysis is needed to determine the smallest air liquefaction machinery that can be used to produce LN2 in an economical manner.

The basic idea of the LN2 propulsion system is to utilize the atmosphere as a heat source and a cryogen as a heat sink in a thermal power cycle. This is in contrast to typical thermal engines which utilize an energy source at temperature significantly above ambient and use the atmosphere as a heat sink. In both cases the efficiency of conversion of thermal energy of the source to work (W) is limited by the Carnot efficiency, h = W/Qh = 1 - Tl/Th, where Qh is heat input, Tl is the sink temperature, and Th is the temperature of the heat source. By using liquid nitrogen as the cryomobile energy sink (Tl = 77 K) this ideal thermal efficiency is impressively high (74%) with an atmospheric heat source at Th = 300 K. The key issues are the ability to design a practical energy conversion system that can take advantage of this high efficiency and the available energy of the cryogen while still being cost competitive with alternative EVs.

http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/CRYOCAR/CryoCar.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC