You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Vigilante. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Vigilante.
Sleeping in his office with a shotgun is fine,

Attempting to detain and arrest a thief is fine,

Blocking the door so the thief couldn't leave would have been fine. But if your too slow to catch the guy, your out of luck.

What's not fine is taking a shot at a thief as he is running away. Especially if he is empty handed.

It's clearly not self-defense, and it appears it's not even defense of property, which may or may not be legal in Hanover, Mass.

So, in response to your question, if the thief was empty handed, there is no valid way to argue he was attempting to protect his property.

That makes him a vigilante.

This guy was out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC