You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: The problem I see and it will come into court someday is this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. The problem I see and it will come into court someday is this
Edited on Mon May-11-09 09:45 AM by Statistical
1) LEO routinely execute no knock raids (often in situations where they are unwarranted).
2) Criminals participating in Home Invasions sometimes pretend or even dress up as LEO to gain element of surprise.
3) Many states now have "castle doctrine" type laws.

So 1 + 2 + 3...
in the middle of the night a law abiding citizen sees some people prowling around the house, nobody announces their intentions, no police car in sight, and then hears the front door being forced open....

should the homeowner shoot?

The point of the castle doctrine is that homeowner shouldn't risk his/her life to determine the intentions of the invaders. The castle doctrine puts an assumption of intent to cause bodily harm on the invader. The homeowner may safely assume (without risk of crminal prosecution) that someone forcing their way into his/her home intends them harm and use lethal force to prevent that invasion.

Should the resident trust masked men rushing the house that they are indeed police? Without any badge, warrant, or anything other than a vest saying Police which can be bought online for $19.95?

If they shoot LEO is it a bad shoot?

If the family is slain because it turns out the invaders are "bad guys" is the city liable by creating a situation where seconds count and there is no good way to identify LEO?

No-knock raids should be a once in a lifetime situation, instead they are too commonly used.

Why no wait for suspect to leave for work?
Arrest him/her in the driveway? Setup roadblock around the corner and follow him in unmarked car?
Why not cut off water/sewage to home to prevent destruction of evidence?

I am not saying there should NEVER be a no-knock raid but it should carry an requirement that an extreme level of risk to evidence, victims, or 3rd parties exists.

No knock raid to rescue an abducted child from a child rapist/murderer - sure.
No knock raid to stop terrorist attack - sure.
no knock raid on warehouse to stop major shipment of drugs - sure.

No knock raid in middle of the night to arrest a man w/ a single marijuana plant - Hell No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC