You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Using the term anti is pejorative, demeaning and dehumanizing. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
45. Using the term anti is pejorative, demeaning and dehumanizing.
Edited on Sat May-28-11 09:19 AM by geckosfeet
I do not need to know details of every gun control law in the world to have an opinion, and am not an advocate of 'strict gun control'. I am an advocate for regulation, and part of regulation is following the law. I certainly do not advocate a flat out ban.

In my experience people who advocate flat out bans are fairly rare. They can be well informed of the laws, very ignorant of the laws, or somewhere in between. In any case the flat out ban position would be unworkable and ineffective. I object to your characterizing anyone who advocates for reform and regulation as an anti or as a supporter of the 'all out ban'.

By regulation and reform I mean keeping guns out of the hands of nut bags and criminals.

One simple example.

***

I am not so sure what 'reduce the general availability of handguns' means. Where I live, the AG has a 'compliant' guns list. These are guns that are approved for sale in the state. I can cross over state lines and go to shops where these non-compliant guns are sold but I can't buy one and the dealers can't sell them to me. The dealers say 'go to gun shows'. I take that to mean that I could get one of these guns through a 'private sale' at a gun show.

Also, I know for a fact that non-compliant magazines and guns are sold at gun shows in my state, and I have no reason to believe that state laws are not being ignored in a similar manner across the country.

Anyway, this 'reduces the general availability' of certain guns, but it is not effective in keeping these guns out of the hands of criminals or nut bags. Why? Because otherwise law abiding citizens choose to ignore certain laws.

***

So don't demonize people who obey the laws, don't own guns or handle guns, or don't like guns. They are not the ones making guns available to criminals and nut bags.

The people who choose exercise their responsibility and rights for gun ownership are responsible for keeping guns out the hands of criminals and nut bags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC