Reply #150: The 9th circuit court does not make the "law of the land." [View All]

It makes law for the 9th circuit. Evidently, when citizens assert their rights they're just "making them up." But when reinhardt changes the definition of the terms in the case HE cites in order to justify his otherwise unjustifiable position, and pulls some screwed up decision right out of his nast ass, then that's "the law of the land and we have to respect it." Yeah, baby, like THAT'S at all consistent.

Anyone care to tell me again how rediculous is the notion that American government can ever be oppressive?

reinhard's a lying sack of shit and it's obvious to everyone. The 9th circuit court is agregiously fraudulent, IMHO, and it'll be a cold day in hell before I take anything from them at face value.

I thank GOD every day that I do not live in THAT land, under THAT law.


EDITED to ask:

Why is it that when WE quote the particulars of the Miller case it's "75 years old" and obviously not relevant. But when reinhardt lies out of his ass and is COMPLETELY dishonest, then his decision is valid and relevant? Oh, I see... Evidently you have to LIE in order to be relevant. My mistake, I didn't know the rules.