Reply #81: btw [View All]

I said nothing about the quote you reference but somehowe I get the feeling you're trying to pin it on me.

Not at all, and I didn't mean to convey any such impression. I was just googling around for confirmation of Brady's political affiliation, and encountered it repeatedly, so headed for the debunking because it looked so utterly bizarre, and just by the bye so completely inconsistent with being a Republican as you asserted she was. I suspected I'd read she was no longer a Republican, but I was a good deal more suspicious about the claim (not by you, you see) that she was a commie.

If Kleck has been "proven" to be a liar, then perhaps you can clear up just what it is he lied about.

Here, you ascribe content to me that wasn't mine. What I actually said in the post you responded to, pretty much as a toss-off in making a different point, was:

I'm not going to cite it (GunCite) when its own source is Gary Kleck, of course, because that's just dumb, and deceitful -- which we know Gary Kleck is.

And I stand by the assessment that someone who propagates material, as truth and scientifically determined fact, that someone who has expertise in such matters cannot help but recognize as bizarrely improbable and hopelessly flawed, is plainly deceitful. (And someone who does it without having the expertise needed for the job, which is how I'd describe our own northern counterpart Gary -- Gary Mauser, a professor of business adminisration for cripes' sake -- is deceitful in perhaps a different way).