Democratic Underground - No, you posted a piece that SAID they were

Reply #59: No, you posted a piece that SAID they were [View All]

MrBenchley

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu May-20-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #57

59. No, you posted a piece that SAID they were

and then wanted to pretend it had "merits"...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=57136&mesg_id=57136

Fat Slob: "it is an interesting read...she does have interesting points...What is disputable is whether her paper is valid. That is the point of this exercise. ...I'm looking for dissection of the arguements raised by the writer. This appears, initially, to be a well written, well reasoned paper...Why don't you go through and dissect it, as requested. Even a tiny bit. Use your well-known reason and intellect and point out falsehoods and facts..."

You sure seemed eager to defend this bigoted bit of filth once.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

Reply #59: No, you posted a piece that SAID they were [View All]