You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: I disapprove (more than disapprove) and it doesn't depend on the ethnicity [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I disapprove (more than disapprove) and it doesn't depend on the ethnicity
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 12:50 PM by LeftishBrit
Not only was I on London public transport the day before the July bombings; I lived for many years with a significant threat from the IRA.

But do you honestly think that there are NOT quite a few places in the world where people think that attacking civilians is OK if it benefits your country or cause? What do you think about the American and British war on Iraq?

No; this didn't cause, let alone justify, the actions of Hamas.

But we are not going to solve or prevent many problems, now or in the future (and I'm not just referring to I/P)if we don't acknowledge that there are a significant number of people who *will* attack those of an out-group in the name of a cause; and not necessarily in defence of civilians; and that this is often glorified.

From a Scottish Jacobite folk song:

"I once had sons but now I have none;
I bred them toiling sarely
But I would bear them all again
To live and die for Charlie."

From Wilfred Owen's famous WW1 poem, "Dulce et Decorum Est", about the death of a soldier from gassing:

"If you could see ..

My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old lie, "Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori."


Children 'ardent for some desperate glory' have been indoctrinated to die and kill for religious and nationalist and other causes, over the centuries. In war, and in terrorist acts - listen to some Irish folk songs! In the past, it is true that fewer people and in particular fewer civilians died as a result(though the fighters often had no more choice than many of their modern counterparts). Due to the development of ever more powerful weapons, war and terror can kill far more people at once now than in the past. So it's even more important now to keep these dangers in mind. Not to justify Hamas or the still uglier Islamic Jihad. But to acknowledge that this all represents a dangerous and easily-exploited, aspect of human nature that can and does arise anywhere.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC