You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #30: you're wrong
[View All]
mrgerbik
(652 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 11:18 PM by mrgerbik
you expect a full inquiry and 100% bona fide case, with every tiny detail laid out with extreme precision. This a ludicrous request to ask a grassroots movement with limited or no access to all of the information. It's not officially OUR job.
Why can't we expect this certain level of undeniable proof and consistancy of the 9/11 commission, NIST and FEMA? The only reason I think many people muck around here day in and day out is the very fact that the whole investigative process witnessed around 9/11 was an obvious sham. It ended up leaving people with more questions then answers. Hence the filling of the vacuum.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread