You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Right. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Right.
In re-reading my post I can see that people might misread it to refer to the Sheffield. When I spoke of just having to "repaint" her, I was talking about a battleship.

You are correct... but it isn't just that Aluminum burns... it's that it doesn't take a whole lot to severely damage an unarmored hull like that. An Exocet actually has an embarrassingly small warhead (around 350 lbs) but still packs a punch against an empty tin can.

Lastly, the damage-control training of the crew matters a great deal. The Stark was hit by two Exocets fired by Iraqi jets (Mirages IIRC) and handled it a bit better - though it was still evidence that armor has advantages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC