Reply #16: Agreed, in both cases [View All]

The refusal to release evidence is bad, unless of course there is something to hide, or possibly those who do not release are intentionally fueling paranoia and CT.

But what is being hidden through the failure to release is not necessarily proof of a missile scenario. Given the other evidence which is available -- and I will just say that I, for one, accept the forensic evidence for the simple reason that it was conducted by a team of over fifty scientists, and I think that if any of them had suspicions that everything was not legit, we would have heard at least a whisper about it by now -- I just don't see any scenario other than the orthodox one as being reasonable. That doesn't mean I accept the government's fairy tale about 9-11. I don't at all. The evidence for LIHOP, to me, is overwhelming. But I just don't see that this particular line of reasoning contributes to it.