Reply #101: "Magic Wings' theories (all 3-5 you use) are all nonsensical, Too silly. [View All]

The overiding issue is whether or not a B757 crashed at the Pentagon.
If one had crashed into the building, the wings would have sheared off.
If they had sheared off, they would have been OUTSIDE the building.
Photos taken shortly after the attack plane hit, do not show any wings.
The explosion was largely confined to the INterior of the building.
It would NOT have consumed the sheared wings which would have been outside the building, if a B757 had crashed there.

There IS evidence of a small jet INSIDE the building.

Your various, wandering, "okay, if you won't believe that one, then how about this one" theories about the missing wings are factually and logically wrong. AND, the available evidence at the Pentagon is NOT consistent with what would be expected if a B757 had crashed there. Besides, you have to account for the two big engines that are mounted underneath those massive wings, and NONE of your various theories even mentions the engines. It's all a hodge-podge of illogic.

You are promoting an impossible bunch of theories, NONE of which is anymore persuasive than ALL of them put together.

Anyone who bothers to read your messages on this subject can plainly see that all you are doing is throwing out a bunch of different lines and hoping no one will notice.

All of which raises a serious question: why do that?