Reply #162: Well, that's just it! [View All]

Abe, old bean! LOGIC! I've seen precious little of it in these claims that Flt 77 never hit the Pentagon because:

a) there were no "wing pieces" outside the building
b) there have not been any photos posted of human remains from the crash site, therefore there were no humans on board
c) any piece of non-building attributed piece of aluminum that is found around a supposed aircraft crash site is said to have been "planted"
d) any other non-building damage, such as downed light poles or damaged multi-ton generators are dismissed casually out of hand
c) someone with so-called minimal flight training "simply could not execute a 270-degree turn with 'military precision' (whatever the hell that is)" when in actuality flying a jet aircraft with computer assisted controls is one of the easiest things in the world - you point the damn thing where you want it to go and it goes there. Someone with minimal flight training would actually be able to "fly" one of these things very easily
d) the damage is not consistent with an airliners crashing into a kevlar-reinforced concrete building (as if as airliner crashing into a kevlar-reinforced concrete building is a common occurrence)
e) surveillance cameras from surrounding businesses and locations, when not released by the authorities, is automatic proof that "they are HIDING something!"
f) databases belonging to the airline and to the government are out of date or not updated, so therefore the aircraft that crashed is still or was still in existence or people who have been long since dead and buried are therefore still alive.
g) aircraft parts found inside the building are dismissed as....well....as who knows what - a nose-gear strut of a 757 is a nose-gear strut of a 757. But it had been PLANTED! Of course!!!!!
h) it was a cruise missile/executive plane/global hawk/F-16/F-18/F-15 controlled automatically by a C-130/Elvis/JSTARS/The White House/the Pentagon.

i-through-infinity I'll leave up to your imagination - Lord knows there are enough claims that lack the framework of logic in this matter.