You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: WHAT Evidence? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. WHAT Evidence?
You point to a fuzzy parking lot series of pictures - its not even a video, its a surveillance cctv camera with a frame rate of 10-15 fps) - and claim some high level extraordinary expertise at divining what exactly is going on there. You claim, with no evidence whatsoever, that a small aircraft impacted the building yet you provide no explanation how a "small" aircraft could cause such damage. You claim a "missile" was fired at the building, yet you offer no example of what type of missile that might have been nor any of the other dynamics that would involve a valid missile-firing scenario (warhead? size?). You ignore the fact that the damage inside the building was *not* blast damage as would have been expected from a missile, but was rather the accumulated mass of 220,000 lbs of former airliner moving initially at 450 knots. You clamor for "mush" as proof, when in actuality it is the height of sick to ask for photos of burned and torn-apart body parts as evidence of a crash. You disregard documented photos of aircraft parts, displaying your lack of knowledge (and that is a generous way of saying that) of how high-bypass jet engines are made. You refuse to provide any documented analysis of any respectable scientist, engineer, mechanic, janitor, farmer or whatever to provide any sort of academic or scientific strength to your claims. Others claim fire trucks COULD NOT get into the center courtyard but firetrucks WERE PUMPING WATER from the center courtyard shortly after noon of 9/11. People say Hanjour could not fly an airplane. If 7-yr old Jessica Dubroff could fly a freaking Cessna, however-old-he-was Hani Hanjour could *point the nose of a airliner* where he wanted it to go and the damn thing would go there. People who say flying a jet is hard have never done it and they know not of what they speak.

I could go on.......

WHAT evidence?

James Michener, in his book "Space", I believe it was, was writing about the Dark Ages. I paraphrase, but "They did not call them the Dark Ages because they could not see, but rather because they choose NOT to see."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC