77. I started using this definition I heard about a year ago
There was a guy on the radio (NPR if you're curious) that was discussion the definition of the term "terrorist" and how malleable it is - how some sides will call a person a "freedom fighter" while the other will call him or her a "terrorist". His definition was simple - all non-state-sponsored violence committed against civilians is terrorism. Maybe it's not the best definition, but I find it to be easier than arguing over terminology. If you have a better one, I'd like to hear it.
Have I sympathized with the causes of terrorists before? Yes. Can I condone their actions? No.
I can't spell his name either.
Is this something you would expect of a progressive Democrat, or do I fail your litmus test?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
