Reply #18: ? [View All]

Hum... read I wrote, sir, and read what you replied again. If there is a "remarkably silly" argument here, I assure you it's not mine.

I really don't think anyone was expecting him to write about what the government is or isn't afraid of. The point is not that. The point is him advocating in favor of the government spending money on agents to undermine criticism toward the official account.

So, I'll give you a chance to fix your argument.

Why would he defend such a thing? What's the logic behind it? What does your "rational" and scientifically based mindset tells you about his intentions? And why does that seem to appeal to the government?

BTW, I found a "pearl" among your arguments. You told me that what he wrote has nothing to do with conspiracists being right, based, solely, in what he wrote. Honey, have you ever thought analizing other people's speeches and looking beyond the argument to understand the context, implications and origins and real motivations behind and beyond the speech, or does your OCT "rational" and "scientific mindset" tells you the most brilliant thing to do is believe any crap people write tell you?

And answering that my argument is "silly" is not a valid answer, I garantee to you anyone reading this is able to notice.

Thank you in advance.