Thanks to you DU, I can now answer all of your 9/11 plot questions! [View All]

So, what really happened on 9/11?

Here's my latest model:

Three of the flights after being taken over (whether by hijackers or remote means) switched off their transponders, rendering them invisible to secondary radar. 11 and 77 did this immediately and never switched on again; while 175 only switched to a different (but detectable) signal for at least some minutes and 93 (I think) switched off and then on again.

On losing transponder beacons from their secondary screen, ground-based air traffic controllers can switch to primary radar, reasonably expecting to see the skin paint of the errant flight.

Instead, on 9/11 they are surprised to see that the area the hijacked flight has entered contains a number of unknown primary blips, none of them with beacons.

The additional blips are being produced by the various military-game flights, whether these are manned, drones, C3 attacks or internal injects.

Part of the wargame scenario is to produce apparent hijackings and see how air defense reacts, and in this the military succeeds marvelously, with almost no one knowing yet that "real" hijackings are also underway.

Possibly of greatest significance is that three of the 9/11 flights -- after their diversions -- flew through areas straight into areas where the FAA's primary radar had been disabled (following the 1999 budget cuts). While 77 supposedly flew over a very large such area in West Virgina twice, 11 and 93 both went out of their way to enter very small blind-spot regions. Both may have switched off their transponders while actually within these blind areas!

So, on 9/11 three of the supposed crash flights disappear from secondary radar, and then also briefly disappear from primary radar! They reemerge from the blind spots as beaconless, primary blips among a number of other blips, which are being produced by the wargames.

Blips merge. Panic ensues.

"Which of these are the hijacked flights?"

("Or wait," others say they asked, "are the hijacked flights part of the exercise?")

"Can someone get me some fuck at the military who actually knows how to stop the wargames? Who the fuck is in charge?"

"Hey, what if one of these blips is an additional "enemy" craft, in addition to the hijacked flights?"

Etc.

(NOTE: a few hours later, the ATCs responsible for the first two crash flights will be asked to tell all they remember in a taped session. The tapes are later destroyed, as we learned last year.)

The military has already made it clear that exercises were suspended and screens cleared only at some point AFTER 9:03.

(See the wargames timeline at

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&before_9/11=militaryExercises

Please note that my thoughts here presuppose intimate knowledge of these timeline entries, so read them if you haven't.)

AFTER 9:03.

This admission tells us that Eberhart's "30 seconds" of resetting the system (according to his cite in the 9/11 Commission report) only came AFTER the second crash. It is tantamount to a confession.

At that point, the attacks had been in motion and known for nearly 50 minutes! By that time, the essential part of "the 9/11 mission"--hitting both WTC towers--had been accomplished. (In fact, if AA 77 and UA 93 had not been delayed on the ground, all of the attacks would have been concluded before the wargames were suspended!)

While this is all happening, the key guys at the top of the chain of command for responding to this crisis all find reasons to go missing until 9:03 or much later:

Bush wants to know what happens to the Pet Goat and hang out with the poor black kids for another 30 minutes, because he loves'em so and doesn't want to scare them. Luckily, someone has told the Secret Service not to haul ass.

Mies (who ran the Global Guardian master wargame incorporating Stratcom and NORAD out of OFFUT AFB) stays at the Offutt private charity breakfast--with Warren Buffett!--until after the second crash. Myers claims he hung out (with Cleland!?) and didn't know jack until a couple of minutes before the Pentagon got hit. (Clarke totally contradicts him, so one or the other is a liar.)

Rumsfeld plays Johnny Steadfast to his morning routine until the Pentagon is hit, and then disappears for an hour afterwards, later claiming he had to play Florence Nightingale. His performance is so outstanding that in the end, even the 9/11 Commission has to admit that the NMCC was still searching for his ass at 10:30 am! (And remember, this is the guy who by order of June 1st 2001, had inserted himself into the military chain of command for domestic air defense interceptions!)

Winfield is not officially in charge of NMCC until 10:30, having asked quite suddenly the night before to be replaced during his next morning's scheduled shift from 8:30am to 10:30 am, the two hours during which the attacks actually took place. A year later, he talks to a documentary interviewer as though he had been in the room all along.

Also on the night of the 10th, at around the same time as Winfield's rescheduling, other Pentagon generals were cancelling their next morning's air-travel plans and Willie Brown was being called by his "airport security" adviser and being told not to fly to New York on 9/11/01. Interesting.

Over at the NRO, a fire-drill planned for 8:30am is based on the scenario of a plane hitting the building. Occupying the 3,000 NRO employees in this fashion incidentally fulfills two functions: a) there is an empty back-up building for any spare "hijackers" to hit; and b) potentially unreliable people who might spot something suspicious if they're at their regular post are instead playing fire-drill, after which they receive word of the real attacks and... are told to go home and take the day off. (NOTE: Though we've never heard anything about it, it will NOT surprise me if one day we hear a similar exercise was being held at the NSA and similary kept people occupied.)

No one is in charge, no one is responsible. Among the top guys, only Cheney admits to having been present at an actual lever for making relevant decisions during the attacks, and he's not even officially part of the chain of command!

In the end, Cheney probably does issue a standdown at some point between 9:03 and the Pentagon hit (which explains the "do the orders still stand?" question from the "young man" reported by Mineta). Cheney would have had the highly credible excuse that, given the earlier confusion (and false assumption of 11 hijackings thanks to the wargames!) they'd have to wait and be absolutely certain a craft was hostile, or else they'd end up shooting down civilian planes.

By then, the confusion of the wargames was being replaced by the new burden of carrying out the Garvey/Sliney order and initiating 4,000 ASAP landings (of ALL planes, including military, though the FAA presumably lacks the authority to require that).

Thus was the necessary protective cover provided that allowed the Pentagon plane (or whatever object it was) to accomplish its mission. (Anyway, someone at the Pentagon might have asked, why should we waste an anti-aircraft missile on this thing, when it's conveniently headed straight for the mostly empty, newly-reinforced part of the building where those fucking annoying ONI guys hang out? Hell, we need some sympathy here. Show the world how bad those fuckers really are, and why we all need to join up in the NEW WAR.)

After that, as it became clear that only one potential hostile was still in the sky, UA 93 was almost certainly intercepted and shot down. The rather naked cover-up since then has obliterated early reports that military planes were indeed on its tail and that Cheney issued a shoot-down order for it. More recently the Commission has moved Cheney's order forward in time by about 40 minutes and given us the further lotto-scale "coincidence" of a random seismic event that "just happened" to mimic a plane crash in the same place three minutes after the Commission's "real" crash time.

Or let's say the whole thing was done by remote avionics (whether these are strap-on or via a software backdoor, obviously there are many potential solutions to remote avionics and DARPA and its predecessors have been working on it since the 1950s).

93 simply could have been steered straight into the ground by the controllers, preventing a passenger takeover and at least giving genesis to "Let's Roll." (Note to spooked911: it fell well into soft ground over a former quarry and exploded within it, which produces all that confetti-sized debris and no visible large pieces. So say people I know who went to Shanksville to check out the land.)

MEANWHILE, IN NEW YORK... (insert demolitions here).

Bush, who given his behavior obviously knew there was no problem in "America being under attack" when Card told him so at 9:05, almost certainly knew few details in advance about the "Pearl Harbor" he would be receiving that day thanks to his generous black-op associates.

He certainly acts like he has foreknowledge and he's (poorly) playing a "somber" role, but why would anyone need to over-inform this idiot, who after all has a penchant for bad impromptu performances?

All he needs to know beforehand is that he will get to play war president. Big war, real soon.

His behavior after leaving the school suggests the following:

By the time he figures out enough, many of his crew are probably in panic that they fucked up some obvious detail that is going to hang them. (Possibly: the 93 and 77 delays meant that everyone had to maintain their duh-what-do-I-do mental holding patterns for longer than originally expected.) They find it essential to go to the control center for the wargames (Barksdale and then Offutt). Just in case some really big distraction needs to be cooked up, this also puts them firmly in place at Offutt's underground nuclear war control bunker, with the "doomsday planes" still in the air.

NOTE: I know, Tarpley has a very different understanding of the above but he proceeds from the pure speculation that the "Angel" warning ("Air Force One is next") was a genuine death threat to Bush from an invisible government that is completely separate from the Bush mob. Isn't it more likely that this same invisible government went to great lengths to put the Bush mob into power so that they could manage the necessary 911 and the "New War"? To me, "Angel" is rather obviously a story juiced up by Rove, Cheney and Safire to excuse their boy's "Odyssey to Offutt" after Bush came under fire from McCain and others for having "run away" from DC, and Tarpley's fallen for it.

At Offutt, the key admin plyers, NORAD and Mies coordinate the story that now must inevitably follow. Some were more in the know about the day's events than others, some were directly involved, some had little clue. Some may even think it was all pulled off by Osama and the 19 Pirates. But now they are all equally in the soup. They must swear allegiance to The Brotherhood of the OCT.

Their secret invocation, valid as both their excuse for 9/11 and as their general philosophy:

"NO IMAGINATION!"

Then he's off to DC for the Bin Ladin frame-up and the declarations of war. He has his milk and cookies (decorated with Prozac chips), writes his diary entry, and goes to bed a righteous man.

Then (according to official story) some SS agents wake him up, saying some object is coming for the White House, and hustle him down to the bunker. Damn them, don't they know the show's long over and this can only be a false alarm?

Off in Afghanistan, genuine Islamofascists, patsies and their controllers alike are all celebrating how well their plot to strike Satan turned out. Who would have thought that the motley crew they dispatched for this job could actually get in, hide out, evade detection, stay off the bottle, learn to fly, overpower crews instantly with knives only, prevent captains from broadcasting hijacking beacons, fly straightaway into the radar blind spots, keep the U.S. air force on the ground for two hours, cause the military high command to take a masturbation break, and locate the emptiest spot in the Pentagon while flying along the ground?

But they did it, all praise to the Will of God!

The Big Wedding of the interests we now shorthand as Neocon and Islamofascist is complete. Their shared world-view (in which the clash between them defines all moral questions and determines the politics of our age) has just successfully committed a coup d'etat on the global Zeitgeist (which had been drifting too obviously into Globalist Aquarian).

A new age begins.

---

Question:

How did "hijackers" (or plane controllers, whether remote or in the cockpit) know where the primary-radar blind spots were? In the case of 11 and 93, they actually went out of their way to enter them.

---

Treason is too simple and obvious an explanation, so I'm sure LARED, Mercutio"ATC" et al. will come up with a suitably pretzely version, which they can claim better suits "the Razor" they keep waving at our rhetorical throats.

And I'm sure some folks on the other side of the line will jump in to explain how irrelevant all of the above thoughts are, given that the WTC had a concrete rebar core and the video shows that UA 175 was actually an AWAC carrying Noah's ark in a sling below it.

Meanwhile, I'm busy and do believe I am done posting here for a few days, except for certain necessary announcements on upcoming activities in NYC.

I'll check in on this thread in a week.