You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Your right, this is not rocket science [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Your right, this is not rocket science
I am just trying to figure out how you decide if information is damaging to the point it requires a cover-up making the killtown "smoking gun" list.

Lets try it this way.

How is one coincidence damaging and requires a cover-up and another is just a normal coincidence and not damaging.

Really I'm not trolling, I am trying to understand the thought process used to determine "9/11 smoking guns".

For instance you think • January 5, 2002 - Bush refers to the day of the 9/11 attacks as "an interesting day." is a smoking gun. How did you figure that out?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC