Hard Evidence For Controlled Demolition [View All]

Wouldm`t it be nice to have evidence ? Dear conspiracy theorists, "physical evidence" nuts, pixel examiners - why don t you PROVE what you say ? You feel unable without the steel?

Forget it. You have better evidence at hand.

1. About 40.000 people worked in the WTC, "only" 3.000 are dead. So you might be able to find at least ONE of those 37.000 who has noticed "Controlled Demolition"-workers placing explosives, spreading cables, drillin holes.

Even if this work was done at night - there will be some people who noticed the new cables, the dust on their desks, the smell. Go and find them, they are reliable in the public as potential victims.

2. I know. I forgot. Best is physical evidence! You can obtain it. Thousands of tons. Even nowadays. Go to Manhattan and ask one of the residents there for some grams of the amonts of dust which covered the streets, buildings and cars these days. Or go to just one of the corners. You will find dust enogh by scatchin a littel bit. It is impossible not to find dust.

Take it and put it into a mass spectrometer at one of the universities. You wiull find the characteristics of the explosive which was used.


What can I conclude if you do not find what I propose ?