You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Hmm... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hmm...
... the suggested answers are very national in orientation. I would say that the rise of democratic socialism in post-WWII Europe has been the most positive turn of events for liberalism. More has been done there to ensure an effective social safety net and at the same time to develop economically than perhaps anywhere else in the world, and in a shorter period of time.

By contrast, post-WWII United States has become steadily less liberal and has become an empire-building national security state which has chosen to wage a succession of small wars, both military and economic, against the rest of the world.

Almost from the inception of the New Deal, the right has been trying to destroy it, and, as of now, they're winning that battle. In fact, liberalism in the US in the 20th century has had but fleeting influence as a body of political thought, with most of that influence concentrated in the most economically turbulent times of the past century.

Most of what we consider politically liberal was accomplished in this country between 1922 and and 1938. Even the Great Society programs of the middle-`60s, historically, had to be tempered by the "liberal" party's unfortunate tendency to wage foreign wars to no good purpose.

The right's current hatred of "Old Europe" is not because that continent is outmoded and archaic in its methods. It is precisely because it is a model of liberalism and has prospered because of that model.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC