on what to do next. I think if he had approached the subject of what to do next he would have had to a) make the book twice as long b) tackle a subject he's less qualified in than social observation and c) allowed the main topic of the book to be overshadowed by arguments about his proposal for actions. Many people may have discounted the observations of the book because they didn't like his proposed plans. We have to understand the obstacle before we reach a solution and Thomas did a great job of describing the obstacle. It's up to us to make a solution, and there may be several good ways to do it.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
