You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about a Clinton/Dean ticket? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:30 AM
Original message
How about a Clinton/Dean ticket?
Advertisements [?]
Just because Hillary doesn't attack at every chance doesn't mean she's not able to win. Some of the most dangerous animals in the wild attack when absolutely necessary, not out of whim.

An attack by Hillary at this moment might get her in the papers for 2 days, but it would also put yet another blemish on the democrats as haters, even if it isn't true. Remember, the Neocons are known to twist what you say into something completely different and put it in 30 second spots 10 times a day and on every talk show.

Notice that Bill Clinton doesn't outright attack either, yet he's regarded as a very strong Democrat. I can't remember the last time that Bill actually outright slammed someone. There's an old saying: Democracy is the art of letting someone else get your way.

Tact is everything. Kerry, for instance, has tact, but he was just boring as hell and couldn't relate to 'common' people out in the country who aren't necessarily neocons but who want someone they feel they can relate to.

Howard Dean is a good candidate because he can relate very well to 'common' people. He also doesn't outright attack all that often. It just seems that way because the neocons put it in the media for weeks on end. They're still playing the 'no republican has ever made an honest living' bit that he said a while ago on an almost daily basis. The reason this works for Dean is that he knows how to NOT fall into the common neocon traps. They want him to shoot his mouth off and dig himself deeper when they smear him. He just comes out and says "Yeah. I did say the republican party is mostly white christians. It IS, isn't it?" and leaves it at that. No trying to explain himself and digging himself in deeper.

Somewhere in the middle of Hillary and Dean is where Bill Clinton was/is, and it's also why he did so well.

In my opinion, a Clinton/Dean ticket would be ideal. Don't run Dean for the president. Let Dean run cleanup for Clinton, which is (in my opinion) the more important of the two jobs. The VP candidate has the ability to speak his mind without consequence MUCH easier than the president, while still getting the same media coverage.

Also, by running Clinton/Dean, you have both sides of the ticket covered. Hillary would pick up the moderates VERY easily, and Dean will pick up the progressives VERY easily. Covering both sides of the Democratic spectrum is what is needed to win.

I'm pretty sure this isn't a very popular opinion here, but it is something that would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC