You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: With all due respect, that seems naive to me. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #103
104. With all due respect, that seems naive to me.
1. We know there were no terrosits in Iraq before the US invasion. We know our troops are a target. But the "people blowing up Iraqi civilians" are NOT "black ops" nor would they stand down if we leave, as you suggest -- most are themselves Iraqi civilians. They are fighting each other. This is much more complex than you seem to realize.

2. Our "friends" are primarily the nations with which we have diplomatic relations, and with which we collaborate in the UN. We have alliances with them, trade partnerships, and political relationships. Yes, BushCo has turned their people against the US under BushCo, which puts their leaders in a very difficult position politically. But that doesn't mean their leaders couldn't be persuaded that it's in their nation's best interest to participate in an effort to assure Iraq's independence, and to persuade their people in turn.

3. No doubt they'd be less "trouble" if BushCo hadn't acted and spoken as they have, but here we are. We still have to deal with them. You suggest there's some optimism there, but there's also alot of danger that needs to be recognized realistically, particularly concerning nukes. These are not friendly, happy, let alone benign countries.

4. I think as Americans, we're a bit spoiled in our views of what economic impact could mean. No, it's not just about "freeing up money" for domestic needs -- it could easily, overnight, become LACK of money for things we take for granted. I'm no expert, but it's my understanding that if oil became traded in Euros, our economy would become irrelevant; and if China ever decided to call in its debts, we'd be done for. People in other countries look at us as spoiled, greedy hogs in many ways. We are already in over our heads in debt. If our economy were severely impacted, you would see suffering not among the Bushes and Cheneys, not among the Ken Lays and Tom DeLays, but among women, children, and minorities first. NO Lydia, it's not about "showing unemployment" from the National Guard and Reserves; it's about things at least three generations of Americans can't even fathom.

5. "Strategy makes no difference if your goal is misguided." Who could disagree with that? I doubt anyone does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC